hypedarhypedar
feedtrendsdiscovershowcasearchive
login
login
login
FeedTrendsDiscoverShowcaseArchiveDashboard
Submit Showcase

Trending now

Linux + Performance42Llm + Agents33Editor + Ide31
View all trends →

hypedar

AI trend radar for developers. Catch emerging papers, repos, and discussions before the hype peaks.

AboutGitHubDiscord

By the makers of hypedar

Codepawl

Open-source tools for developers.

Explore our tools →
AboutPrivacyTermsX

© 2026 Codepawl

Built by Codepawl·© 2026

About·Terms·Privacy·Security

GitHub·Discord·X

feedtrendsdiscovershowcasearchive
← feed
arXiv4h ago
4.8

Redirected, Not Removed: Task-Dependent Stereotyping Reveals the Limits of LLM Alignments

Divyanshu Kumar, Ishita Gupta, Nitin Aravind Birur, Tanay Baswa, Sahil Agarwal, Prashanth Harshangi

View original ↗

Analysis

Viral velocity
low
Implementation gapYES
Novelty7/10
Categorypaper
Topics
alignmentethicsevaluationbenchmarkingllm

Opportunity Brief

Create an open-source evaluation suite that probes LLM bias using a hierarchical taxonomy across multiple task types. This tool should demonstrate how alignment wrappers can be bypassed using task-switching, helping developers audit models more effectively.

Suggested repo: bias-probe

"Your model passed the safety test, but is it actually biased? Expose hidden stereotypes across 9 hierarchical axes."

Estimated effort: 60h