hypedarhypedar
feedtrendsdiscovershowcasearchive
login
login
login
FeedTrendsDiscoverShowcaseArchiveDashboard
Submit Showcase

Trending now

Linux + Performance42Audio + Copyright + Ethics39Agents + Cli36
View all trends →

hypedar

AI trend radar for developers. Catch emerging papers, repos, and discussions before the hype peaks.

AboutGitHubDiscord

By the makers of hypedar

Codepawl

Open-source tools for developers.

Explore our tools →
AboutPrivacyTermsX

© 2026 Codepawl

Built by Codepawl·© 2026

About·Terms·Privacy·Security

GitHub·Discord·X

feedtrendsdiscovershowcasearchive
← feed
arXiv1d ago
5.0

Xpertbench: Expert Level Tasks with Rubrics-Based Evaluation

Xue Liu, Xin Ma, Yuxin Ma, Yongchang Peng, Duo Wang, Zhoufutu Wen, Ge Zhang, Kaiyuan Zhang, Xinyu Chen, Tianci He, Jiani Hou, Liang Hu, Ziyun Huang, Yongzhe Hui, Jianpeng Jiao, Chennan Ju, Yingru Kong, Yiran Li, Mengyun Liu, Luyao Ma, Fei Ni, Yiqing Ni, Yueyan Qiu, Yanle Ren, Zilin Shi, Zaiyuan Wang, Wenjie Yue, Shiyu Zhang, Xinyi Zhang, Kaiwen Zhao, Zhenwei Zhu

View original ↗

Analysis

Viral velocity
low
Implementation gapYES
Novelty7/10
Categorypaper
Topics
reasoningevaluationtraining

Opportunity Brief

Build a standardized 'rubric-scoring' library that wraps LLM evaluations in a transparent validation framework. This would allow developers to define complex business-logic rubrics for their own benchmarks.

Suggested repo: rubric-eval

"Stop guessing your LLM's performance with fuzzy benchmarks."

Estimated effort: 60h